Solutions · Federal & public sector
Prove your AI’s oversight and record-keeping posture — in the government’s own terms.
You answer to responsible-AI standards and record-keeping requirements. You need to run an assessment inside a system that produces tamper-evident proof, and to know exactly which parts are ready today and which are on a path.
What does it
- Records →
a tamper-evident logbook whose chain an auditor verifies independently.
- Compliance →
run an assessment against controls, with the evidence produced as the product runs.
- Chatbot guard →
the oversight gate — held-for-a-person on anything uncertain.
See it work
Walk the governance engine →The same controls-and-evidence flow a responsible-AI assessment runs on, with a signed offline-verifiable pack.Frameworks it maps to
- DoD responsible-AI alignment (ai.mil)Engine maps it — control pack in progressthe substrate already lands Traceable and Governable — the record, the oversight gate, and the automatic stop that halts a risky action; the authored framework pack is scoped and in progress.
- NIST AI RMFEngine maps it — control pack in progresspulled ahead of the others; the crosswalk runs on the built engine.
Honesty about stage: the responsible-AI alignment above is scoped and real, but it is not a government authorization. FedRAMP and an impact-level authorization are a future path, not a current status — we state the stage and never imply otherwise.